Sustainable Tourism Law

772 SUSTAINABLE TOURISM LAW It requires the design of a curriculum that, from the idea of a new epistemology for the design of projects or for the approach to problems for their resolution, it incorporates different basic, social and psychosocial, macro and microeconomic, political, axiological anthropological, spatial and physical disciplines, by expert teachers, who after the schematic presentation of the core concepts of their disciplines, should be available to guide students along the different aspects that should be considered in the project or problem that need to address. In this scheme, the task of professors requires: ✔ To state a real problem or evaluate the proposal of a project. ✔ To guide in the formulation of all the elements included in the problem or project. ✔ To collaborate in the assessment and identification of the possible consequences of the decisions to be adopted. ✔ To guide from their disciplines on which the existing answers are. ✔ To guide in the search for information and identification of each of the stakeholders with opposing or favourable interests to the solution of the problem or to the execution of the project. The teaching task and the participation of the professors with different scientific knowledge must appear in following debate workshops from which the transdisciplinary approach that recovers the unity of knowledge arises. The task I propose requires a profound re-elaboration of teaching methods and poses a challenge to teaching training. It requires more in-depth aspects of its development and execution as well as carrying out pilot experiences to be assessed. In order for the professor to work with this training methodology, he must adopt a humble attitude about his disciplinary knowledge, beyond his constant updating in the progress of the discipline itself. It is the recognition that his exclusive view of the limited subject that he handles, it will be surprised by data and events from observing his object included in a complex, non-linear plot, fully biased for which the observed object is the product of the observer and, yet, it does not lack certainty. This humble attitude means recognizing and, where appropriate, including or receiving in the analysis, the product of knowledge coming from the daily practical experience of those who, without a scientific view, are linked to the study objects.